You hear the cable-TV pundits talk about it all the time - "the wisdom of the American people." Well, they have to sell their books and magazines and programs. Mustn't ruffle the public's feathers. But really. I think the one who got it right was George Carlin, who said it all: "The public sucks." Well, at least an unfortunately high percentage of them do.

I supported Barack Obama and was happy to see him win. I think 53 million people voted for him. Good. But we have to remember that something like 47 million voted for McCain. Unbelievable. That after eight years of hell with Bush and Cheney. That after it was known uncontrovertibly that McCain had supported ninety percent of Bush's policies. Yes, policies like unending, unjustified war; environmental pollution; destruction of citizens' rights; policies that resulted in radical economic decline; and on and on.

Yes, the wisdom of the American people. How blasted stupid can they be? Who the hell are they? What happened to their brains? As the headline read after Bush was re-elected: "How can so many millions of people be so dumb?"

I know that the reader is aware of all this. But what I want to stress is that this degeneration of the American psyche is really the central critical problem which faces this nation. It is nothing less than frightening. Benjamin Franklin spoke candidly about the issue over two-hundred years ago, saying: "This form of government will work only so long as the population hasn't become corrupt." The dictionary definition of the word "corrupt" includes : " altered for the worse; debased; lacking integrity." How "debased" are the millions of Americans who give silent- or not-so-silent- consent to the destruction and slaughter of thousands of human beings - all for the financial profit and power-mania of their rulers? How altered for the worse are people who consistently vote against their own best interests? And how stupid, for that matter? One can make excuses for them and maintain that they've just been duped by the right-wing propaganda; but it seems that the sad truth is that a very substantial number of them just favor a basically fascistic governmental system. If that's the "American Way," God help us indeed.

The brutal fact is that I'm talking about well over half the American population. It is difficult to estimate with precision; but that appears to be a safe bet. And we must disabuse ourselves of any notion that they will change: "Those who refuse to see become blind." They are essentially robotic and tightly programmed and they constitute a virtually permanent bloc. They will present an ongoing, relentless threat to the basic values of this nation. And they think they're so right. Apparently, unjustified war is right. Torture is right. Enriching the few at the expense of the many is right. They wave their flags and raise their crosses while all this goes on.

And you must be noticing the general tenor that's becoming standard behavior in this society. Our glorious public asserts its "equality" by being rude and inconsiderate to just about everyone. Bad manners are in. Civility- if they can even conceive of it- is old-fashioned. And more and more they even talk as if they were computers- devoid of individual judgment, human warmth or common sense. Narcissistic and selfish to the point of being sociopathic ; untrustworthy; mercenary; and amoral. You must have heard about the recent poll that was conducted among American high-school students recently: Over 60% of them admitted readily to lying and cheating regularly; and over 90% of them said they were quite comfortable with their behavior. Well, what kind of example have their "leaders" provided?

It's not that there aren't millions of sane and basically decent Americans left. There are. It's just that it's becoming more and more difficult for them to function comfortably in an increasingly negative and hostile social milieu. The dog-eat-dog society: When I was younger I thought that to be an exaggeration. No longer.

Enter Obama. A brilliant campaign based on mobilizing millions of Americans fed up with the corrupt status quo. My impression is that his stated objective of positive change and unification is genuine and sincere. But I don't see him as a cow-eyed idealist. He has to know what he's up against. He made two remarks during the campaign that were quite telling: One- which raised quite a fuss- was the comment about the masses and their "guns and religion." The other- which went largely unnoticed- was the line in his nomination-acceptance speech I think: "Government is not supposed to be against the people; it's supposed to be for the people." Those two statements really sum up what less eloquent people like myself have been trying to say for years. And when you think about it they are very strong positions, particularly the last one- because if the government is "against the people," then the people would be entitled to overcome it by force if necessary. That's really the central founding principle of our nation. Thanks to the genius of our Constitution we haven't come close to armed rebellion in this country since the Civil War. But if things had continued in the direction they were going for long enough, who knows?

The critical problem that faces Obama as he enters the Oval Office is this robotic bloc- these essentially mindless millions, not to mention their hypocritical, fear-mongering leaders with their insane egos and bottomless pockets. They will be prepared to pounce on him from day one. In fact they've begun already. Their main tactic we know for sure: They'll blame Obama for all the chaos and havoc which they themselves have brought about. The blame- transfer will be in full swing. This will be nothing like "loyal opposition." This will be out-and-out sabotage of lethal potential. If they can get away with it, that is. Their plans to establish a permanent power-aristocracy of wealth founded on the fearful submission of millions of compliant subjects have been interfered with; and we can be sure they'll do anything and everything they can not to lose what they've gained.

This all becomes so problematic. One doesn't want to become the mirror image of the opposition in the process of attempting to defeat them. But they have to be defeated. One can use words like "compromise" or "accommodation" or what have you; but the fact is that the essentially un-American agenda that has been established and implemented by this immensely powerful cabal has to be obliterated. Nothing less. Otherwise we have to be willing to become a nation of serf-subjects begging for subsistence from the ruling masters of the Star Chamber. There was a rebellion against that sort of thing over two-hundred years ago: It was called the American Revolution.

You know the really frightening thing about these millions and their rulers is that conscience is bracketed out of their mind-set. You see, it really isn't they who are implementing or tacitly supporting the needless slaughter of thousands of human beings. No, it's just a function of "national security." And no, it isn't they who are depriving workers of fair wages and bargaining rights and pensions- and their jobs and healthcare for that matter. No, it's just the "corporate agenda." Torture and deprivation of legal and privacy rights? No, that's not on their plate. Just "intelligence necessities" occasioned by the "war on terror." There's no end to the functional sociopathy. And they're quite polite; go to church; don't make scenes; help old ladies to cross the street; and give to charity. Guiltlessness. Salvation by abstraction. The American Way. Yes, very problematic.

I can't even begin to say how all this will be resolved, if at all. But I think a very positive factor was the Obama campaign's remarkable ability to gather and to mobilize vast numbers of people to actively support Obama's candidacy and his agenda. The establishment of that counter-force was wisdom indeed. And based upon what I am hearing via emails from the Transition Team, it appears that the President-Elect is going in the right direction in terms of preserving, enhancing and expanding his people's base and organizing them for specific, sustainable supportive work. Any real change will most certainly have to come from the grassroots up. And Barack Obama and his White-House staff and Cabinet will need all the help they can get, given the kind of organized opposition they will encounter. We're playing for keeps now. Our life as a nation and as a people depends on the outcome.

I'm going to be optimistic. And I pray that optimism will be a self-fulfilling prophesy. If the President-Elect's superb campaign is any indication of his potential ( and why wouldn't it be? ), then we have good reason to expect the best. And who knows? Maybe I'm wrong about the un-changeability of some Americans. Perhaps good example and change that they can see and feel might wake them up. Godspeed to this challenging and crucial new enterprise.

Oh, I'll tell you, you liberal nose-bleeders just don't get it. I mean, really, what is all this hoopla about torture and illegal detention and all that? What do you want to see- Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and whom-have-you swinging from the gallows like Saddam Hussein? What kind of PR would that be for the USA? Or even in prison. Can you name one American president who wound up in the clink? That didn't even happen to Nixon. I mean - stop it.

You just don't understand centrism. You don't know how to look ahead. And what if Bush sent thousands to their deaths for oil profits and to prove himself a great president? How could he have become great without war? And didn't those wise enough to be his friends deserve a little extra money in their pockets?

Look, whiners, this is a for-profit-only country. If you haven't noticed that then you certainly haven't been in the hospital lately. Or you haven't tried to send your kids to college. Or you haven't tried to pay the mortgage, buy food and have your teeth fixed at the same time. I mean if you had been a lot greedier and made friends with the right people you'd be having it a lot easier right now.

This is a merchant kingdom. Get it? Yes, there are three branches of government: The rich merchant branch; the rich merchant branch; and the rich merchant branch. So stop bellyaching and get with the program. If you don't obey your merchant- rulers they will crush you. Do you want to be marginalized? Do you want to be out in the street? Do you want your neighbors to call you a socialist? Or even accuse you of being French? So shut up and munch on your Freedom Fries. Or do you want them to take your house away and give it to someone who can pay higher taxes? Or double your minimum payments on your credit cards? Or reveal what you've been saying in your emails? Get with it.

Look at Obama. Do you think he wants to be hounded? Look what they did to Clinton even after he gave in and became corporate. They just don't forgive the slightest assault on their power. If they did that to Clinton, what do you think they'd do to Obama, who doesn't even match their coloration requirements? So what do you want Obama to say? That his priority will be to convict and punish war criminals like Bush and Cheney? Don't you see the two of them playing a game of chicken right now? They both just said publicly that they had authorized torture. Do something about it. We dare you. That's what they're saying. McCain got 47 million votes, suckers. So do something about it.

It's not that we don't sympathize with you. The moral sense and all that. But be realistic. As far as I know, there's never before been a nation where the merchants have had absolute control. And that means that profit is the only value. I mean money. Haven't you noticed that Americans are now classified by their "net worth." That's the only thing that's respected. And if you don't have that, but only have, let's say, "creative genius" or "spiritual insight" or what-have-you, you'll be deeply resented and marginalized. So get real- and if possible get rich. And for God's sake don't step on their toes. They shall prevail.

The sons and daughters of the merchant aristocracy just don't get jailed or hanged- "war-criminals" or not- unless they're unwise enough to displease their peers. Yes, Bush and Cheney lost the election for the many-mansioned McCain. But they still pulled in 47 million, so Nob Hill isn't ready to hang their own quite yet. So what does Obama do- call in marshals from the World Court to haul away Bush and Cheney? We're not even in the World Court anymore. Bush made sure of that.

Who knows? Obama is smart. He could conceivably find a way. Otherwise, just chalk it up to the new moral order, my justly indignant ones. Look forward. Care for a Kleenex?

Ennis Friary, Ireland

Cashel Tower, Ireland

Blarney Castle, Ireland

It would be difficult to prove this beyond doubt, but my guess is that the root cause of eight years of Bush-Cheney and the consequent critical condition of this nation is the abortion issue. I don't think Bush would have gotten in once, let alone twice, had it not been for abortion. The votes of Evangelicals, Catholics and other religious groups were crucial. They made the difference. And the difference was monumental in terms of the welfare of our country.

Then Barack Obama came onto the scene. Before the extent of the economic disaster brought on by Republican de-regulation became more than readily apparent, the polls were quite close between Obama and McCain; and McCain might well have edged in just as Bush had- twice- before him. Another disaster for the nation barely averted.

As unwise as single-issue voting is- and it is very unwise- the fact of the matter is that it can be- and has been- the determinant factor governing the fate of the nation. And the single issue I am referring to is abortion.
Liberal and moderate pro-choice candidates are viewed by millions of Americans as the purveyors of what they refer to as "the culture of death." Voters close their eyes to the wholesale slaughter and destruction caused by the right-wing war-mongerers and profiteers, whom they put into office time and time again, responding to their hypocritical cries of "pro-life." A sad irony but unfortunately the fact.

The issue of abortion has to be dealt with decisively and without delay- unless we feel comfortable handing over the nation to the for-profit-only proto-fascists on a silver platter.

I think Barack Obama has shown the right instincts in this matter. His choice of a pro-life evangelical pastor to deliver the invocation at his inauguration was a step in the right direction. And we have to follow Obama's lead and pursue an objective course on the issue of abortion.

Not only must we listen respectfully to what pro-life adherents are saying; but we need to take the initiative in the area of studying the causes of widespread abortion in this country and of advocating for and implementing means of significantly reducing the number of abortions which are currently taking place. Above all, we cannot appear to be indifferent to or pleased with the fact that there have been 50 million abortions since Roe vs. Wade was decided. Whether one is pro-life or pro-choice that is an awfully high abortion rate. I think we can all acknowledge that.

What to do? I won't pretend to have the definitive answer. But I think the key word is initiative. Liberals and moderates need to be perceived to be the leaders in terms of actively examining the causes of high abortion rates. They need to be seen as innovators in terms of developing and implementing methods and programs calculated to decrease the number of abortions. One obvious area for development would be the expansion of adoption agencies and the updating of adoption procedures, perhaps under federal guidelines. These and many other possibilities need to be actively explored. And the effort has to be sincere, on-going, well-organized and highly competent. This cannot be and cannot be perceived by the public as a political stunt by the Left. It has to be real and it has to show positive results.

Yes. A volatile issue and a dangerous one. How to accomplish the objective without alienating millions of pro-choice people and feminist groups? How to avoid fostering guilt and depression in women choosing abortion? The utmost in objective thought, tact and superb judgment will be required. We have good reason to believe that President Obama will have what it takes to initiate the process of resolving this crucial issue. The process has to begin. This weapon has to be taken out of the hands of those who would use it for their own purposes.